Defence VS Counter-Offensive

Defence VS Counter-Offensive: Survive or Reverse the Situation?

In real life, you don't always choose the moment when things get out of hand. You'd like to think that you've always "read" the environment well, spotted latent aggression, anticipated the build-up of tension. But often you haven't. You're already there when you realise it. The reality is that we're not always in ultra-perceptive ninja mode, and that's where this article comes in. Defence VS counter-offensive will make all the difference.

Sometimes, even when you've spotted the problem, you haven't been able or haven't dared to take preventive action: no early strike, no deterrent move. Perhaps because you had doubts, because the social framework held you back or because you were caught off guard. Result: you're under fire, in the storm.

At this stage, you're on the defensive, but you're also at a crossroads. You can either sit back and take it, hoping to limit the damage, or you can go on the counter-attack to regain control. That's when it really counts: staying passive or reversing the dynamic.

When you train people to deal with violence, you know that the battle begins long before the first blow. It takes place in the mind. On the field, those who survive - and above all those who dominate - are those who refuse to remain stuck in simple defence.

In the street or anywhere else, when you're in a position of pure defence, you're already behind. The counter-offensive is the tool that enables you to get back on track and turn the situation around.

Defence = to suffer, counter-offensive = to regain the advantage

Defending yourself is not useless. But it's temporary. It's an emergency stopgap. Pure defence is the airbag that prevents the impact from being fatal. But you can't win a race with an airbag.

If you stay in this posture for too long, you do what the aggressor expects: you protect yourself, you take the heat, you try to "limit the damage". Meanwhile, he's dictating the tempo. And in real violence, the person who sets the pace already has 80 % of control.

It won't be long before he finds the flaw in your best cover, or worse, pulls out a gun...

The counter-offensive is when you switch from survival mode to active mode. You get the upper hand, you shake up his plan.

Here is a nice video of Urban Combatives School of self Protection :

"Retreat" or "tactical withdrawal": the art of naming things correctly

In training, I like to use this military example. Why? Because soldiers are conditioned to read situations in terms of mental dynamics. Because soldiers are conditioned to read situations in terms of mental dynamics.

"Retreat" means backing down under pressure. It's a sudden flight.

"Tactical withdrawal" means deliberately retreating, to set up an ambush, reposition your forces or regain the upper hand further on. You're always on the move, always anticipating.

When you're faced with an attack, if you back down just to back down, you're psychologically defeated. But if you're backing down because you've got something in mind - changing angles, feinting, luring into a gap - you're already reprogramming the situation to your advantage.

Fight back: the instinct to fight back

"Fight back' is a crude expression. That's the Anglo-Saxon spirit: don't just stand there and take it, give him his money back, with interest.

But be careful: that doesn't mean charging into the fray like a buffalo. It means: "I refuse to remain in the position of the victim". It's a clear message to the other person and to yourself: "I'm here, I'm dangerous for you too".

This mental shift is vital. Especially against opportunistic attackers looking for soft victims. The simple act of biting can be enough to make them hesitate.

Action vs Reaction: getting out of the freeze trap

The problem with pure defence is that it can leave you in a state of shock. You go into reactive mode. You wait for the next move, the next action from your opponent.

In a violent situation, this reflex can freeze you and keep you in the posture of the prey. But the human body is wired to go through a freeze phase before acting. The danger is in getting stuck there.

Your internal dialogue must be prepared:
"Okay, I blocked for a second, now I'm hitting back."

Defence is only a transition. It absorbs the initial shock, but must never become a permanent state. Your objective: as soon as your brain picks up again, you must immediately look for an opening to counter-attack.

Defence ≠ punching bag: remains unpredictable

Defending yourself doesn't mean turning into a punching bag.

A passive, static defence is a nightmare. Your body becomes legible. A good attacker can instantly see your flaws.

A lively, mobile, rhythmic defence is a weapon in itself. You need to blur the lines and hide your intentions. For example, your covers must be active: changing angles, moving around, making your supports move.

Your opponent can't read your game any more and the gaps are less obvious and less accessible. You make them doubt and you create an opportunity for yourself. And that's when the window for a counter-attack opens up.

Learn to cope and breathe in the chaos

In real violence, not everything is "clean". You're going to take a beating. The question is not "Can I take it? but "How am I going to stay upright and clear-headed despite the shock?

That's where a lot of conventional training fails. You're shown how to block, how to dodge... but rarely how to breathe after taking a hard blow or how to take it and stay in the game.

Combat sports teach you this. Stress inoculation: getting used to the fact that pain, impact and adrenaline are part of the scenery. You learn to deal with it and stay functional. That's the real key. And that's what some martial arts and self-defence are often criticised for.

You can't counter-attack if you're mentally knocked out after the first shock. So work on your tolerance threshold. Learn to breathe in the storm.

Out of context: the counter-offensive in everyday life

What if we took it off the streets? Because this logic also works... at work, for example.

Imagine your manager or a toxic colleague attacking you in a meeting: a scathing remark, unjustified criticism, or a desire to pin you down.

If you stay in defence mode ("I justify myself", "I put my head down"), you just take it and let the other person control the scene. This is the "I take the blows" version.

But if you go on the counter-offensive (calmly and precisely), you can turn the situation around:

• Ask a question that makes the aggressor face up to his contradictions.
• Redirect criticism towards a strong point or a solution.
• Subtly question your behaviour in front of everyone.

You create a rupture. You force the other person to react to your movement instead of passively defending yourself.

The dynamic is the same as in self-defence: the one who imposes the action is the one who calls the shots, even verbally.

The trap of the "good guy" who accepts everything

In everyday life, too many people remain in a constant state of social defence. They take micro-aggressions, verbal attacks or injustices in their stride, without ever striking back...

The result? Burn-out, loss of confidence, chronic frustration.

A well thought-out counter-offensive is not synonymous with systematic conflict. It's just the ability to say: "No, you're not stepping on my toes. I'm moving again, I'm breaking your plan".

In the street or in an open space, it's the same: defence without a counter-attack = vulnerability. Defence + counter-offensive = control and renewed respect.

Practise counter-offensive thinking everywhere

Whether it's physically in a fight or mentally in a business meeting, train yourself never to get stuck in defensive mode.

1. Accept the impact. It will come in the form of a blow or a verbal attack.
2. Immediate mental switch. "Okay, now I'm taking over."
3. Creates an opening. Through movement, words or an action that destabilises the other person.
4. Relaunch the action. Even a small boost is sometimes enough to break the spiral of control.

In conclusion: change your software

Defending yourself must never become your default state. Whether faced with a fist or a verbal attack, your aim is to get out of the passive position.

Defence is a temporary necessity. The counter-offensive is your way out of control.

And in a world where violence (physical or psychological) can happen anywhere, it's best to learn to change your stance quickly.

If you want to read other similar articles, click here 😉